The first
BUELL immigrant is William BUELL, born possibly before 17 Feb 1604/5 in
Chesterton, Huntingdon, England, according to several records. He arrived
in approximately 1630, apparently settling first at Dorchester MA, then moved
to Windsor, settling there in about 1635 or shortly after. In England,
the surname was sometimes seen as Bevil(le). Occasionally the Buell family is
considered from Wales, but this may well be an error. In the link about Chesterton in
1870-1872 HERE, the
Bevil name shows up as of the surname of early owners of the Manor in the
Parish of Chesterton. And more information for searching in this region
of Huntingdon is found HERE.
One major source for Buell records is Albert Welles' publication
in 1881: The History of The
BUELL FAMILY in England, From the Remotest Times Ascertainable from Our Ancient
Histories, and in America, from Town, Parish, Church and Family Records.
Illustrated with Portraits and Coat Armorial. This book is available on Google Play
free. There are
apparently some errors and confusion with some of the details in this book,
particularly with the earliest statements of ancestry, but as providing a set
of clues for early settlers in America, it has been very helpful in my first
steps with the Buell families.
William BUELL & his wife Mary POST married in Windsor,
Connecticut, 18 Nov 1640, and eventually had 7 children, 2 boys and 5 girls,
all born in Windsor. William was apparently a skilled cabinet maker, and
general carpenter, excellent skills for the new colonies.
My line goes as follows - #
is generation number:
1. William BUELL, 17 Feb 1604/5 Chesterton, Huntingdon,
Eng; d. 1681 CT; Mary POST
2. Samuel William BUELL, 2 Sep 1641, CT; d. 1720 CT;
Deborah GRISWOLD
3. Samuel BUELL, 20 Jul 1663 CT; d. 1732 CT; Judith
STEVENS
4. Nathaniel BUELL, 29 Sep 1700 CT; death date not
known; Deborah HORTON
5. Grover BUELL, 4 Apr 1732 CT; d. 1818 NY; Jerusha
BUCK
6. Grover BUELL, 22 Jan 1759 NY; d. 1811 NY; Mehitable
[unknown]
7. Grover BUELL, 24 Dec 1794 NY; d. 1874 NY; Charlotte
BORTLE
8. Harriet F. BUELL, 27 Jan 1829 NY; d. 1911
NJ; James M. TERWILLIGER
9. James Grover "Grove" TERWILLIGER, 27 May
1856 NY; d. 1929 NJ; Clara GRAVES
10. Marguerite Josephine TERWILLIGER, 19 May 1880 NY;
d. 1973 BC Canada; ChasEK
- then, my mother; JnoG
- then, ME
Do you see all those "Grover Buell" individuals?
Some of their siblings named their sons Grover Buell as
well, living in the same region, in the same years. Challenging, very
challenging! Because first names were repeated in each generation
of each sibling - making a rather confusing mixture of finding same-named
individuals in the same geographic setting at the same time - many records need
to be followed with local histories, christenings, birth/marriage/death/burial
records, land use, and early census records are essential to follow the lines.
Early BUELL settlers in the first and 2nd generations married into
well-known New England families: Fenner, Griswold, Horton,
Palmer, Parmalee, Porter [many marriages], and Welles/Wells.
Mary POST, wife of William BUELL, has listed her mother as Mary Porter
Mills... and the Porter intermarriages may be cousins of course. Both the
BUELL and POST families were originally from Chesterton; Mary's parents
apparently died at sea on the way over from England to the colonies.
Several wives of these BUELL men [#'s 6, 7] are very difficult to
research, and continue to be end points in my family tree. Bit by bit by bit, I
hope to start filling in more information. This is by no means the only
information I have on the Buell line, but I'm always happy to find out a bit
more, see another land grant, or a record of any kind.
If you have any information on any of these individuals, please
feel free to comment below and/or contact me at calewis at telus dot net.
2 comments:
Celia, I applaud your naming of the book with erroneous content. So often people allude to errors in research but don't share details of the offending resource.
Thanks Jill - I so wish there was an annotated review for each "history/genealogy" book out there! Of course, I'd also like to think there has been better more thorough research used in recent times! Thanks for commenting.
Post a Comment